农业与技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (15): 87-91.DOI: 10.19754/j.nyyjs.20220815021
陈欣悦 邓康龙 汪倩倩 曾小雨 徐裕焕
出版日期:
2022-08-14
发布日期:
2022-08-15
作者简介:
陈欣悦(1998-),女,硕士在读。研究方向:环境管理与可持续发展研究。
Online:
2022-08-14
Published:
2022-08-15
摘要: 畜禽产品在生产过程中需要占用大量水土资源,畜禽养殖业也是农业碳排放的主要贡献者。为了评价畜禽养殖业的环境影响,利用环境足迹法评估畜禽养殖过程中的资源消耗和碳排放是当前的研究热,点。本文对国内 外有关畜禽养殖业的水一土一碳足迹研究成果做出了比较系统的总结,重点阐述了水一土-碳足迹研究的基本概念、方法,基于大量文献成果系统分析了当前水-土-碳足迹的研究现状和研究趋势,探讨了目前畜禽养殖业水-土-碳足迹研究存在的问题并进行展望,为我国未来畜禽养殖的水一土一碳足迹研究提供参考。
中图分类号:
. 畜禽养殖业的水土碳足迹研究进展[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(15): 87-91.
[1 Steinfeld H,Gerber P J,Wassenaar T,Castel Vincent,RosalesMauricio,De haan C.Livestock's Long Shadow:EnvironmentalIssues and Options M].Rome,Italy:Food and Agriculture Or-ganization of the United Nations,2006. [2]中国农业农村部.全国生猪生产发展规划(2016一2020年)EB/OL ]http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2016/diwuqi/201711/20171127_5920859.htm.2017-11-27. [3]Wackernagel M,Rees W.Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Hu-man Impact on the Earth [M].New Society Publishers,1996. [4]Hoekstra A Y,Chapagain A K,Aldaya MM,Mekonnen MM.The Water Footprint Assessment Manual:Setting the Global Stand-ard M].Social and Environmental Accountability Joural,2011. [5]Allan J A.Virtual water:A strategic resource:global solutions toregional deficits [J].Ground water,1998,36 (4):545-546. [6]Hoekstra A Y.Virtual Water Trade:Proceedings of the Internation-al Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade M].The Netherlands:Value of Water Research Report Series,2003. [7]方恺.足迹家族:概念、类型、理论框架与整合模式[J].生态学报,2015,35(06):1647-1659. [8]邢浩翰,李保明,郑炜超,刘志丹,张源辉.畜禽产品水足迹研究进展[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(06):196-205. [9]Bai X,Ren X J,Khanna N Z,Zhang G P,Zhou N,Bai Y,HuM T.A comparative study of a full value-chain water footprint as-sessment using two international standards at a large-scale hog farmin China [J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,176:557-565. [10]Giljum S,Wieland H,Bruckner M,De Schutter L,Giesecke K.Land Footprint Scenarios:A Discussion Paper Including a Litera-ture Review and Scenario Analysis on the Land Use Related toChanges in Europe's Consumption Patterns M].Vienna:Sus-tainable Europe Research Institute,2013. [11]Ibidhi R,Hoekstra A Y,Gerbens-Leenes P W,Chouchane H.Water,land and carbon footprints of sheep and chicken meat pro-duced in Tunisia under different farming systems J].Ecologicalndicators,2017,77:304-313. [12]杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁.生态足迹分析理论与方法[J].地球科学进展,2000(06):630-636. [13]Wiedmann T,Minx J.A Definition of Carbon Footprint'[M].CC Pertsova,Ecological Economics Research Trends.HauppaugeNY,USA:Nova Science Publishers,2008:1-11. [14]BSI.Guide to PAS 2050.How to assess the carbon footprint ofgoods and services M].London,UK:BSI,2008. [15]王微,林剑艺,崔胜辉,吝涛.碳足迹分析方法研究综述[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(07):71-78. [16]Matthews H S,Hendrickson C,Weber C.The importance of car-bon footprint estimation boundaries [J].Environmental ScienceTechnology,2008,42:5839-5842. [17]Guzman-Luna P,Gerbens-Leenes P W,Vaca-Jimenez S D.The water,energy,and land footprint of tilapia aquaculture inmexico,a comparison of the footprints of fish and meat [J].Re-sources,Conservation and Recycling,2021,165:105224. [18]Noya I,Aldea X,Gasol C M,Gonzalez-Garcia S,Amores M J,Colon J,Ponsa S,Roman I,Rubio M A,Casas E,Moreira MT,Boschmonart-Rives J.Carbon and water footprint of pork sup-ply chain in Catalonia:From feed to final products [J].Joumalof Environmental Management,2016,171:133-143. [19]Luo T,Yue Q,Yan M,Cheng K,Pan G X.Carbon footprint ofChina's livestock system -A case study of farm survey in Sichuanprovince,China [J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,102:136-143. [20]Chen X W,Chen Y,Liu XX,Li Y L,Wang X L.Investiga-ting historical dynamics and mitigation scenarios of anthropogenicgreenhouse gas emissions from pig production system in China [J].Joural of Cleaner Production,2021,296:126572. [21]Xie D,Zhuo L,Xie P X,Liu Y L,Feng BB,Wu P T.Spati-otemporal variations and developments of water footprints of pigfeeding and pork production in China 2004-2013)[J].Agri-culture,Ecosystems and Environment,2020,297:106932. [22]Naranjo A,Johnson A,Rossow H,Kebreab E.Greenhouse gas,water,and land footprint per unit of production of the Califomiadairy industry over 50 years [J].Joural of Dairy Science,2020,103(4):3760-3773. [23]Li M Q,Liu S L,Sun Y X,Liu Y X.Agriculture and animalhusbandry increased carbon footprint on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateauduring past three decades [J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278:123963. [24]Dai X W,Sun Z,Muller D.Driving factors of direct greenhousegas emissions from China's pig industry from 1976 to 2016 [J].Joural of Integrative Agriculture,2021,20 (1):319-329. [25]Arrieta E M,Gonzalez A D.Energy and carbon footprints ofchicken and pork from intensive production systems in Argentina[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,673:20-28. [26]Nakamura K,Itsubo N.Carbon and water footprints of pig feed inFrance:Environmental contributions of pig feed with industrial a-mino acid supplements [J].Water Resources and Industry,2019,21:100108. [27]Sporchia F,Kebreab E,Caro D.Assessing the multiple resourceuse associated with pig feed consumption in the European Union[J].Science of the Total Environment,2021,759:144306. [28]Zhuo L,Liu Y L,Yang H,Hoekstra A Y,Liu W F,Cao X C,Wang M R,Wu P T.Water for maize for pigs for pork:An analy-sis of inter-provincial trade in China [J].Water Research,2019,166:115074. |
[1] | . 山地城市群城市洪涝韧性时空格局研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(7): 78-85. |
[2] | . 汉江流域生境质量时空变化特征及驱动力分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(7): 86-92. |
[3] | . 科尔沁左翼中旗土地沙化时空动态变化及驱动力分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(7): 93-97. |
[4] | . 人工湿地在乌梁素海水环境治理中的应用研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(7): 101-105. |
[5] | . 东北地区积雪典型年的大气环流综合分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6): 54-61. |
[6] | . 龙溪河流域土地利用变化及影响因素研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6): 62-68. |
[7] | . Cd污染对艾纳香根际土壤因子及微生物种群的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6): 69-74. |
[8] | . 区域三生系统同发展水平评价及障碍因素分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6): 75-80. |
[9] | . 乡村振兴中水文地质调查与利用[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6): 81-85. |
[10] | . 基于深度学习的宏观风资源评估与风电场选址[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6): 86-90. |
[11] | . 基于GIS的藏东南泥石流灾害风险预警系统研发[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(6): 91-96. |
[12] | . 容县耕地土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(5): 92-97. |
[13] | . 辽宁省农作物秸秆基料化利用现状与对策[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(5): 98-100. |
[14] | . 新发展阶段视角下的干旱地区农业面源污染治理思考[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(5): 101-106. |
[15] | . 一株产电菌的产电性能及低温沼气发酵过程微生物群落特征[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(5): 107-111. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||